JapCarForum Cars, Cars, Cars! General Car Maintenance Mazda MX5 MK3 nc handling

Mazda MX5 MK3 nc handling

Mazda MX5 MK3 nc handling

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
steviewevie
Posting Freak
7,993
21-05-2016, 11:37 PM
#11
I think the corporate monsters would do well to employ you as their geometry consultant Tony !

[Image: Sig-enginebay.jpg]
IS200 Turbo project now just about complete ! See my thread here and leave your comments.
Now running standalone Syvecs ECU and no stock ECU !
steviewevie
21-05-2016, 11:37 PM #11

I think the corporate monsters would do well to employ you as their geometry consultant Tony !


[Image: Sig-enginebay.jpg]
IS200 Turbo project now just about complete ! See my thread here and leave your comments.
Now running standalone Syvecs ECU and no stock ECU !

99
22-05-2016, 12:20 PM
#12
Lexusboy Your business would not be so good had you not spoke out Tony.
The owners of these cars know some thing is not right and your putting the car back to where these cars should be before leaving the factory gates.

I need to be fair... Between the design and build there's many alterations some of which are to tune the chassis to "simulated parameters", the reason there simulated is because domestically we have to many examples for any design engine to compute.

What normally happens is that as "disputed" situations arise the manufacturer will release revised settings that should regain the true chassis intentions i:e no tyre wear or to resolve handling complaints.

What happened with the Lexus is they didn't offer revised settings and by the time i found the problem it was to late for them to resolve without costing millions is liabilities.

The MX5 problem is bordering the irretrievable so it's fingers crossed time the problem officially goes public?
wheels-inmotion
22-05-2016, 12:20 PM #12

Lexusboy Your business would not be so good had you not spoke out Tony.
The owners of these cars know some thing is not right and your putting the car back to where these cars should be before leaving the factory gates.

I need to be fair... Between the design and build there's many alterations some of which are to tune the chassis to "simulated parameters", the reason there simulated is because domestically we have to many examples for any design engine to compute.

What normally happens is that as "disputed" situations arise the manufacturer will release revised settings that should regain the true chassis intentions i:e no tyre wear or to resolve handling complaints.

What happened with the Lexus is they didn't offer revised settings and by the time i found the problem it was to late for them to resolve without costing millions is liabilities.

The MX5 problem is bordering the irretrievable so it's fingers crossed time the problem officially goes public?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Related Threads…
Replies 8
Views 786
19-12-2018, 12:14 AM
Last Post by S
Replies 12
Views 2,403
06-12-2018, 12:58 AM
Last Post by speedview
Replies 19
Views 1,453
09-09-2018, 05:15 AM
Last Post by Jaminglish
Replies 4
Views 681
15-12-2017, 03:59 AM
Last Post by Mikey
Replies 0
Views 3,698
09-07-2017, 06:22 AM
Last Post by Bobby
Replies 76
Views 3,904
29-04-2017, 12:07 PM
Last Post by ormi
Replies 7
Views 634
09-02-2017, 11:08 PM
Last Post by abactus
Replies 4
Views 494
18-01-2017, 12:24 AM
Last Post by Bobby
Replies 15
Views 1,164
21-10-2016, 04:49 AM
Last Post by toxo
Replies 1
Views 496
11-05-2016, 10:43 AM
Last Post by Anees