SC IS200 vs IS300
SC IS200 vs IS300
The IS200 S/C gets 205PS/261Nm according to the swiss tuner Bemani.
The IS300 has 215PS/288Nm stock.
However, the IS200 has shorter gearing (21%, 4.7% and 9.5% on 1st, 2nd and 3rd gears respectively), and slight weight advantage (about 10%).
So, they will be very, very close.
If you just compare the claimed 0-60 times the supercharged IS200 should be a tiny bit quicker.
Standard IS200 (manual): 9.5s
Standard IS200 (auto): Can't find any numbers. Probably too slow to measure.
Supercharged IS200 (manual): 7.3s (according to TTE)
Standard IS300 (auto): 7.4s
Standard IS300 (manual): 6.8s
The manual IS300 only needs one gear change as it does 62mph in second gear.
I think it wad 5th gear that did a report on manufacturers 0-60 times and only the aerial atom was "as described".
FirebirdPhil I think it wad 5th gear that did a report on manufacturers 0-60 times and only the aerial atom was "as described".
FirebirdPhil I think it wad 5th gear that did a report on manufacturers 0-60 times and only the aerial atom was "as described".
The only factor to me is the gearbox, manual vs manual the 300 has to win that race.
Trouble is nobody actually specified what sort of race the two would have, the question was just 'which is faster' and without knowing what sort of conditions the cars are in you can't really answer that. Standing start? Rolling start, from what speed? Up to what speed, or is it a set distance?
Also I forgot about the manual IS300, I just assumed we were all talking about the normal UK auto version.
Could throw an rs200 into the mix aswell!
1/4 mile sounds good though, never had my tezza on the strip
Had my gen 7 celica on the 1/4 mile at crail before.
wullie_trd Had my gen 7 celica on the 1/4 mile at crail before.
wullie_trd Had my gen 7 celica on the 1/4 mile at crail before.